People v. Poliandro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Poliandro

122 A.D.3d 777, 994 N.Y.S.2d 868

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 2014

Docket2013-01375

StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.3d 777 (People v. Poliandro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Poliandro, 122 A.D.3d 777, 994 N.Y.S.2d 868 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered January 17, 2013, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the trial judge should have recused himself is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Pearson, 78 AD3d 968, 969 [2010]; People v Doyle, 15 AD3d 674, 675 [2005]; People v Jackson, 185 AD2d 363 [1992]) and, in any event, without merit (see People v Glynn, 21 NY3d 614, 618-619 [2013]; People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405-406 [1987]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI