People v. Poler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Poler

154 A.D.2d 905, 546 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12880

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 154 A.D.2d 905 (People v. Poler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Poler, 154 A.D.2d 905, 546 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty [906]*906plea, made long after sentencing, must be considered as a motion to set aside the conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10 and it is not appealable as of right. Thus, we do not consider defendant’s contention that the court’s denial of his motion was an abuse of discretion.

Defendant’s contention that the Judge’s communication with the victim was ex parte and without defendant’s consent is not supported by the record. Moreover, defendant has failed to raise this issue for our review as a matter of law by objecting either at sentencing or at resentencing or by moving to set aside the sentence. (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Kelly, J. — attempted sodomy, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty [906]*906plea, made long after sentencing, must be considered as a motion to set aside the conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10 and it is not appealable as of right. Thus, we do not consider defendant’s contention that the court’s denial of his motion was an abuse of discretion.

Defendant’s contention that the Judge’s communication with the victim was ex parte and without defendant’s consent is not supported by the record. Moreover, defendant has failed to raise this issue for our review as a matter of law by objecting either at sentencing or at resentencing or by moving to set aside the sentence. (Appeal from judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Kelly, J. — attempted sodomy, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 A.D.2d 905, 546 N.Y.S.2d 988, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-poler-nyappdiv-1989.