People v. Polanco

228 A.D.2d 229, 643 N.Y.2d 997, 643 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6537
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 11, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Credibility issues were properly presented to the jury, and we see no reason to disturb its verdict. The observing officer had an ample opportunity to observe the drug transactions, which included a direct sale made by defendant, and defendant’s exercise of dominion and control over, and thus constructive possession of, the drugs located in a dumpster (People v Morales, 162 AD2d 128). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Polanco, 228 A.D.2d 229, 643 N.Y.2d 997, 643 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6537 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

228 A.D.2d 229 (People v. Polanco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sweat
308 A.D.2d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)