People v. Polanco

158 A.D.2d 436, 551 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2102
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Polanco. Read the opinion of the Court — 169 A.D.2d 551

Opinion

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, lv denied [437]*43772 NY2d 918.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Kassal, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Polanco, 158 A.D.2d 436, 551 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

158 A.D.2d 436 (People v. Polanco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Farrar
419 N.E.2d 864 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Felman
141 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)