People v. Poladian

166 A.D.2d 903, 561 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12173

This text of 166 A.D.2d 903 (People v. Poladian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Poladian, 166 A.D.2d 903, 561 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to provide a valid line of reasoning to support the jury’s verdict (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review powers, we conclude that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rossetti, J.— attempted assault, second degree.) Present—Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A.D.2d 903, 561 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-poladian-nyappdiv-1990.