Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Pokuwaah

People v. Pokuwaah

114 A.D.3d 967, 980 N.Y.S.2d 819
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 2014·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the de[968]*968fendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Latella, J.), rendered May 22, 2012, convicting her of grand larceny in the second degree (five counts) and criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree (five counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions that certain testimony was improperly admitted at trial are unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Graves, 85 NY2d 1024 [1995]). In any event, her contentions are without merit (see People v Reid, 19 NY3d 382, 388 [2012]; People v Keindl, 68 NY2d 410, 422 [1986]).

The defendant’s attorney provided meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]). Mastro, J.P, Dickerson, Lott and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pokuwaah, 114 A.D.3d 967, 980 N.Y.S.2d 819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

114 A.D.3d 967 (People v. Pokuwaah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Graves
654 N.E.2d 1220 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Reid
971 N.E.2d 353 (New York Court of Appeals, 2012)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Keindl
502 N.E.2d 577 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)