People v. Poinsett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Poinsett

1 A.D.2d 615, 767 N.Y.S.2d 661

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 2003·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the de[616]*616fendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), imposed January 19, 2001, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive (see People v Williams, 306 AD2d 544 [2003]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Santucci, J.E, McGinity, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the de[616]*616fendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), imposed January 19, 2001, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive (see People v Williams, 306 AD2d 544 [2003]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Santucci, J.E, McGinity, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

People v. Poinsett, 1 A.D.2d 615, 767 N.Y.S.2d 661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

1 A.D.2d 615 (People v. Poinsett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related