People v. Poinsett
This text of 1 A.D.2d 615 (People v. Poinsett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the de[616]*616fendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), imposed January 19, 2001, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive (see People v Williams, 306 AD2d 544 [2003]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Santucci, J.E, McGinity, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 615, 767 N.Y.S.2d 661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-poinsett-nyappdiv-2003.