People v. Poerschke

44 A.D.2d 844, 355 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4980
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 20, 1974·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered August 4,1971, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Case remanded to the County Court for a determination concerning whether the People’s pretrial photographic identification procedures were impermissibly suggestive, tended to cause a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentifiea[845] tion, and tainted the trial identification of defendant by the People’s identification witness. Pending such determination, the appeal will be held in abeyance. It was error to deny defendant’s motion for a pretrial hearing concerning the photographic identification of him by the People’s identification witness (People v. Harrington, 31 N Y 2d 785). Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Poerschke, 44 A.D.2d 844, 355 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

44 A.D.2d 844 (People v. Poerschke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thomas
60 A.D.2d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. Poerschke
48 A.D.2d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)