People v. Plumey
This text of 255 A.D.2d 462 (People v. Plumey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered November 27, 1995, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by limiting the defendant’s cross-examination of the victim about collateral, irrelevant matters (see, People v McGriff, 201 AD2d 672).
Since the defendant was convicted of assault in the first degree under Penal Law § 120.10 (3) (depraved indifference assault), the jury never reached the lesser-included offense of assault in the second degree under Penal Law § 120.05 (1) (intent to cause serious physical injury). Therefore, we do not consider whether the more remote lesser-included offense of assault in third degree under Penal Law § 120.00 (1) (intent to cause injury) also should have been submitted (see, People v Johnson, 87 NY2d 357, 361; People v Boettcher, 69 NY2d 174, [463]*463180 [“where a court charges the next lesser included offense of the crime alleged in the indictment, but refuses to charge lesser degrees than that, we have noted that the defendant’s conviction of the crime alleged in the indictment forecloses a challenge to the court’s refusal to charge the remote lesser included offenses”]). Thompson, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D.2d 462, 680 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-plumey-nyappdiv-1998.