People v. Plenty

145 A.D.2d 444

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Dachenhausen, J.), both rendered April 10, 1985, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree under indictment No. 84-00806-01, and robbery in the first degree, under indictment No. 84-00922-01, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We find that the record was sufficient for the sentencing court to determine the amount of restitution required under indictment No. 84-00922-01 (see, People v Fuller, 57 NY2d 152, 157-159).

We note that the sentencing court did not impose restitu[445] tian upon the defendant’s sentence under indictment No. 84-00806-01.

We further note that the defendant made no effort to withdraw his pleas at the time of sentence (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). Mollen, P. J., Brown, Kunzeman, Weinstein and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Plenty, 145 A.D.2d 444 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

145 A.D.2d 444 (People v. Plenty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fuller
441 N.E.2d 563 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)