People v. Pleitez-Raymundo

2018 NY Slip Op 2659
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 18, 2018
Docket2016-00756
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 2659 (People v. Pleitez-Raymundo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pleitez-Raymundo, 2018 NY Slip Op 2659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Pleitez-Raymundo (2018 NY Slip Op 02659)
People v Pleitez-Raymundo
2018 NY Slip Op 02659
Decided on April 18, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 18, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
BETSY BARROS
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2016-00756

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Norman Pleitez-Raymundo, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 2519/14)


Edward M. Gould, Islip, NY, for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Grazia DiVincenzo of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Barbara Kahn, J.), rendered January 20, 2015, convicting him of attempted rape in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review because he did not move to vacate his plea or otherwise raise this issue before the County Court (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Jackson, 114 AD3d 807). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered his plea of guilty, as the court adequately advised the defendant, through an interpreter, of the constitutional rights that he was surrendering by pleading guilty and the direct consequences of his plea (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17; People v Sirico, 135 AD3d 19, 22; People v Bennett, 122 AD3d 871, 872; People v Solis, 111 AD3d 654, 655).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., AUSTIN, COHEN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bennett
122 A.D.3d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Sirico
135 A.D.3d 19 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Solis
111 A.D.3d 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Jackson
114 A.D.3d 807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 2659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pleitez-raymundo-nyappdiv-2018.