People v. Pleasant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pleasant

87 A.D.3d 932, 929 N.Y.2d 855

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.D.3d 932 (People v. Pleasant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pleasant, 87 A.D.3d 932, 929 N.Y.2d 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

[933]*933The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence supports inferences that defendant intended to forcibly steal property while aided by others, and that the victims were physically injured in the course of an attempt to take property. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Richter and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[933]*933The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. The evidence supports inferences that defendant intended to forcibly steal property while aided by others, and that the victims were physically injured in the course of an attempt to take property. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Richter and Román, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.3d 932, 929 N.Y.2d 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pleasant-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack