People v. Platt

5 A.D.3d 402, 771 N.Y.S.2d 907

This text of 5 A.D.3d 402 (People v. Platt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Platt, 5 A.D.3d 402, 771 N.Y.S.2d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court, dated November 18, 2002 (People v Platt, 299 AD2d 496 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 15, 2000, on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Ordered that the appellant is granted leave to serve and file a brief on the issues of whether the court erred in discharging a juror over defense counsel’s objection and in failing to give the appellant’s counsel an opportunity to be heard in connection with notes sent by jurors for clarification of a charge; and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to County Law § 722 the following named attorney is assigned as counsel to prosecute the application: Mark Diamond, Esq., Murray Hill Station, EO. Box 1805, New York, N.Y. 10016, and it is further,

Ordered that assigned counsel shall prosecute the application expeditiously in accordance with this Court’s rules (see 22 NYCRR 670.1 et seq.) and written directions; and it is further,

Ordered that the application is held in abeyance in the interim. Krausman, J.P., Goldstein, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Platt
299 A.D.2d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.3d 402, 771 N.Y.S.2d 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-platt-nyappdiv-2004.