People v. Planas

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 27, 2026
Docket2024-02102
StatusPublished

This text of People v. Planas (People v. Planas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Planas, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

People v Planas - 2026 NY Slip Op 03324
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

People v Planas

2026 NY Slip Op 03324

May 27, 2026

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jonathan Planas, appellant.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Decided on May 27, 2026

2024-02102, (Ind. No. 70528/21)

Colleen D. Duffy, J.P.

Barry E. Warhit

Lourdes M. Ventura

Lisa S. Ottley, JJ.

Adam Seiden, Mount Vernon, NY, for appellant.

Susan Cacace, District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Brian R. Pouliot of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (George E. Fufidio, Jr., J.), rendered February 22, 2024, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he validly waived his right to appeal (see People v Bryant, 28 NY3d 1094; People v Batista, 167 AD3d 69, 73-74). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v MacFarlane, 140 AD3d 1089, 1090; People v Ropiza, 100 AD3d 935, 936).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Battle, 239 AD3d 764, 765).

DUFFY, J.P., WARHIT, VENTURA and OTTLEY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
People v. Planas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-planas-nyappdiv-2026.