People v. Plair

119 A.D.3d 877, 989 N.Y.S.2d 394
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 23, 2014·No. 2013-02022·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), imposed March 16, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, EJ., Dillon, Lott, Sgroi and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Plair, 119 A.D.3d 877, 989 N.Y.S.2d 394 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

119 A.D.3d 877 (People v. Plair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Seck
2018 NY Slip Op 8511 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)