People v. Place

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Place

195 A.D.2d 529, 601 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7212

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 195 A.D.2d 529 (People v. Place) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Place, 195 A.D.2d 529, 601 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7212 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), both rendered October 31, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under Indictment No. 32/90, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts) under Indictment No. 67/90, upon jury verdicts, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdicts of guilt were not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either not preserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), both rendered October 31, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under Indictment No. 32/90, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts) under Indictment No. 67/90, upon jury verdicts, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdicts of guilt were not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either not preserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 A.D.2d 529, 601 N.Y.S.2d 825, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-place-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack