People v. Pizzaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pizzaro

7 A.D.3d 395, 776 N.Y.S.2d 469, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6971

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 18, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J.), rendered February 20, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that although religious references in summation should be avoided (see e.g. People v Johnson, 3 AD3d 581 [2004]), the brief and innocuous rhetorical device employed by the prosecutor did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. The other summation remarks challenged by defendant were not so egregious as to warrant reversal (see People v D'Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Lorenzo, J.), rendered February 20, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that although religious references in summation should be avoided (see e.g. People v Johnson, 3 AD3d 581 [2004]), the brief and innocuous rhetorical device employed by the prosecutor did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. The other summation remarks challenged by defendant were not so egregious as to warrant reversal (see People v D'Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119 [1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 884 [1993]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

People v. Pizzaro, 7 A.D.3d 395, 776 N.Y.S.2d 469, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6971 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

7 A.D.3d 395 (People v. Pizzaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related