People v. Pizarro

286 A.D.2d 653, 730 N.Y.S.2d 431, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8843
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Pizarro. Read the opinion of the Court — 297 A.D.2d 826

Opinion

[654]*654Defendant’s suppression motion was properly denied. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the evidence established that Miranda warnings were read to defendant upon his arrival at the precinct. The strategy employed by the police to obtain defendant’s presence at the precinct, and their concealment from defendant of the true purpose of the interview, does not warrant suppression since it was not so fundamentally unfair as to deny due process nor was it likely to induce a false confession (see, People v Tarsia, 50 NY2d 1, 11). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pizarro, 286 A.D.2d 653, 730 N.Y.S.2d 431, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8843 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 653 (People v. Pizarro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Tarsia
405 N.E.2d 188 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)