People v. Pizarro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pizarro

154 A.D.2d 409, 546 N.Y.S.2d 977, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12295

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 2, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 154 A.D.2d 409 (People v. Pizarro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pizarro, 154 A.D.2d 409, 546 N.Y.S.2d 977, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.),. rendered September 23, 1987, convicting her of assault in the second degree, petit larceny and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, after a jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[410]*410Even when read in the light most favorable to the defendant, there is no reasonable view of the evidence that would support a finding that the defendant’s attack upon the complainant was justified. Therefore, the court did not err in declining to charge the jury on the law of justification (see, People v Padgett, 60 NY2d 142, 144-145).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Eiber, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.),. rendered September 23, 1987, convicting her of assault in the second degree, petit larceny and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, after a jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[410]*410Even when read in the light most favorable to the defendant, there is no reasonable view of the evidence that would support a finding that the defendant’s attack upon the complainant was justified. Therefore, the court did not err in declining to charge the jury on the law of justification (see, People v Padgett, 60 NY2d 142, 144-145).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Eiber, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 A.D.2d 409, 546 N.Y.S.2d 977, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pizarro-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack