People v. Pittman
716 N.W.2d 557, 474 Mich. 1146
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Arnold PITTMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons stated in her dissenting statement in People v. Conway, 474 Mich. 1140, 716 N.W.2d 554 (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Pittman, 716 N.W.2d 557, 474 Mich. 1146 (Mich. 2006).
716 N.W.2d 557 (People v. Pittman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Jordan
716 N.W.2d 557 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)