People v. Pittenger

296 N.E.2d 803, 32 N.Y.2d 711, 344 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1365
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 25, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: Failure to warn a defendant that he may be sentenced as a multiple offender if he has a prior conviction, although directed by section 335-b (subsequently 335-c) of the former Code of Criminal Procedure, does not require reversal where no prejudice is shown (People ex rel. Gallagher v. Follette, 22 N Y 2d 239, [712] 244-245; People ex rel. Purvis v. La Vallee, 18 N Y 2d 753, 755; People v. Porter, 14 N Y 2d 785, 786, cert. den. 390 U. S. 1016). Where defendant concedes that he was not eligible for multiple-offender treatment, the warning would be meaningless in his case and he was not harmed by the failure to warn (see People ex rel. Doud v. Mancusi, 39 A D 2d 837 [4th Dept.]; People v. Stephens, 38 A D ,2d 908 [1st Dept.]; but see People v. Pray, 37 A D 2d 1004 [3d Dept.]; People v. Jordan, 27 A D 2d 584 [3d Dept.]).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Waohtler.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pittenger, 296 N.E.2d 803, 32 N.Y.2d 711, 344 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1365 (N.Y. 1973).

296 N.E.2d 803 (People v. Pittenger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Cody v. Henderson
54 A.D.2d 1137 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)