People v. Pinoargotty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pinoargotty

294 A.D.2d 379, 741 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4754

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 294 A.D.2d 379 (People v. Pinoargotty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pinoargotty, 294 A.D.2d 379, 741 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4754 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), rendered June 30, 1999, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, unlawful imprisonment in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly found that the defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the prosecutor exercised peremptory challenges in a discriminatory manner (see People v Brown, 97 NY2d 500; People v Taylor, 288 AD2d 331; People v Cousin, 272 AD2d 477; People v Vidal, 212 AD2d 553).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J.P., Altman, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI