People v. Pinera

235 A.D.2d 271, 652 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 274
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.), rendered June 29, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent prison terms of 4½ to 9 years and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the court improperly refused to sanction the People for failing to produce a data sheet is unpreserved for appellate review since defendant did not specify the type of relief demanded (see, People v Pabon, 213 AD2d 289, lv denied 86 NY2d 739) and, in any event, failed to pursue his claim after the court invited further argument (see, People v Jackson, 78 NY2d 900). We decline to review his claim in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that a sanction was not warranted since the record does not establish that the data sheet had ever existed (see, People v Damaceno, 214 AD2d 464, lv denied 86 NY2d 734). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Nardelli, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pinera, 235 A.D.2d 271, 652 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 274 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

235 A.D.2d 271 (People v. Pinera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Walker
265 A.D.2d 254 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)