People v. Pincus

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Pincus

238 N.E.2d 316, 21 N.Y.2d 987, 290 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1463

DecidedApril 11, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 238 N.E.2d 316 (People v. Pincus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pincus, 238 N.E.2d 316, 21 N.Y.2d 987, 290 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1463 (N.Y. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by defendant Cruz to amend remittitur granted to the extent indicated. Return of remittitur is requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: [988]*988Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of defendant under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. Defendant argued that his .rights thereunder were violated by reason of the admission of his allegedly involuntary confessions and the Trial Judge’s advice to the jury that he had made an initial determination that defendant’s confessions were voluntary. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of defendant’s constitutional rights (21 N Y 2d 691).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by defendant Cruz to amend remittitur granted to the extent indicated. Return of remittitur is requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: [988]*988Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether the rights of defendant under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments were denied. Defendant argued that his .rights thereunder were violated by reason of the admission of his allegedly involuntary confessions and the Trial Judge’s advice to the jury that he had made an initial determination that defendant’s confessions were voluntary. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of defendant’s constitutional rights (21 N Y 2d 691).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 N.E.2d 316, 21 N.Y.2d 987, 290 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pincus-ny-1968.