People v. Pinckney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pinckney

234 A.D.2d 483, 651 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13113

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 10, 1995 (People v Pinckney, 220 AD2d 539), affirming a judgment and an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both rendered January 18, 1994. Justice Miller has been substituted for the late Justice Hart {see, 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 10, 1995 (People v Pinckney, 220 AD2d 539), affirming a judgment and an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both rendered January 18, 1994. Justice Miller has been substituted for the late Justice Hart {see, 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

People v. Pinckney, 234 A.D.2d 483, 651 N.Y.S.2d 262, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13113 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

234 A.D.2d 483 (People v. Pinckney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related