People v. Pina

249 A.D.2d 421, 670 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3909
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 13, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 421 (People v. Pina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pina, 249 A.D.2d 421, 670 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Kowtna, J.), rendered December 1, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress statements made by him to the police.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court properly denied those branches of the defendant’s [422]*422omnibus motion which were to suppress the defendant’s post-arrest statements to the police, as the police had probable cause to arrest him (see, People v Bigelow, 66 NY2d 417, 423).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Copertino, Thompson and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pina v. Kuhlmann
239 F. Supp. 2d 285 (E.D. New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 A.D.2d 421, 670 N.Y.S.2d 786, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pina-nyappdiv-1998.