People v. Pina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pina

50 A.D.2d 804, 375 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11625

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 804 (People v. Pina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pina, 50 A.D.2d 804, 375 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 25, 1974, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, unauthorized use of a vehicle and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reversing the conviction and sentence for possession of burglar’s tools and dismissing the count therefor in the indictment. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt defendant’s guilt of the charge of possession of burglar’s tools. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered March 25, 1974, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, unauthorized use of a vehicle and possession of burglar’s tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by reversing the conviction and sentence for possession of burglar’s tools and dismissing the count therefor in the indictment. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The evidence was insufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt defendant’s guilt of the charge of possession of burglar’s tools. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 804, 375 N.Y.S.2d 853, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pina-nyappdiv-1975.