Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Pilgrim

People v. Pilgrim

49 A.D.3d 564, 851 N.Y.2d 883
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.3d 564 (People v. Pilgrim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pilgrim, 49 A.D.3d 564, 851 N.Y.2d 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

The defendant’s claim that the County Court should have dismissed the indictment pursuant to CPL 210.20 (1) (h) is unpreserved for appellate review because he failed to move for such relief in the County Court (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Garcia, 33 AD3d 1050 [2006]; see also People v Gathers, 280 AD2d 554 [2001]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt [565]*565was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Lifson, J.P., Ritter, Florio and Garni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Garcia
33 A.D.3d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Gathers
280 A.D.2d 554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.3d 564, 851 N.Y.2d 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pilgrim-nyappdiv-2008.