People v. Pierre

2016 NY Slip Op 8330, 145 A.D.3d 527, 41 N.Y.S.3d 886
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Pierre. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 A.D.3d 1490
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 2016·No. 2454 1996N/10·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered February 9, 2012, as amended March 1, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (four counts), criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree, and three counts each of endangering the welfare of a child and unlawfully dealing with a child, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender previously convicted of a violent felony, to an aggregate term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations, including its rejection of defendant’s claim that the police who executed a search warrant planted various contraband and a large amount of cash in defendant’s apartment. The fact that defendant was not convicted of all the charges does not warrant a different conclusion (see People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557 [2000]).

Concur— Tom, J.P., Friedman, Saxe, Feinman and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pierre, 2016 NY Slip Op 8330, 145 A.D.3d 527, 41 N.Y.S.3d 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 8330 (People v. Pierre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Rayam
729 N.E.2d 694 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)