People v. Pierce
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Thomas P. Franczyk, J.), rendered September 16, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the third degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convict *1965 ing him upon his plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.05) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (§ 155.30 [8]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that “[t]he plea colloquy and the written waiver of the right to appeal signed [and acknowledged in County Court] by defendant demonstrate that [he] knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal,” including the right to appeal the severity of the sentence (People v Farrara, 145 AD3d 1527, 1527 [2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]). Defendant’s valid waiver forecloses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]; cf. People v Maracle, 19 NY3d 925, 928 [2012]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2017 NY Slip Op 5389 (People v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.