People v. Pickering
113 A.D.3d 572, 979 N.Y.2d 521
Opinion
The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]), and we perceive no basis for reducing that term. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, Renwick, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Pickering, 113 A.D.3d 572, 979 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
113 A.D.3d 572 (People v. Pickering) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lingle
949 N.E.2d 952 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)