People v. Pick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pick

253 A.D. 861, 1 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8935

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 861 (People v. Pick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pick, 253 A.D. 861, 1 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8935 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of conviction of grand larceny, first degree. The indictment charged the crime as grand larceny committed under sections 1290 and 1294 of the Penal Law, the crime being committed by color and aid of false pretenses and representations made by the defendant which he knew to be false and fraudulent and relied upon by the person to whom they were made and as a result of which he secured $600 which he appropriated to his own use. The testimony was sufficient to warrant the conviction. There were no serious errors in the trial, at least there was none that would require a reversal in this court. Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of conviction of grand larceny, first degree. The indictment charged the crime as grand larceny committed under sections 1290 and 1294 of the Penal Law, the crime being committed by color and aid of false pretenses and representations made by the defendant which he knew to be false and fraudulent and relied upon by the person to whom they were made and as a result of which he secured $600 which he appropriated to his own use. The testimony was sufficient to warrant the conviction. There were no serious errors in the trial, at least there was none that would require a reversal in this court. Judgment of conviction unanimously affirmed. Present — Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 861, 1 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pick-nyappdiv-1938.