People v. Pica

90 A.D.3d 554, 934 N.Y.2d 701

This text of 90 A.D.3d 554 (People v. Pica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pica, 90 A.D.3d 554, 934 N.Y.2d 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated denial of the motion. Defendant had an extensive criminal history and an extremely poor .prison disciplinary record (see e.g. People v Gonzalez, 29 AD3d 400 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 867 [2006]). Concur — Saxe, J.P, Catterson, Moskowitz and Acosta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gonzalez
29 A.D.3d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.3d 554, 934 N.Y.2d 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pica-nyappdiv-2011.