People v. Pica
90 A.D.3d 554, 934 N.Y.2d 701
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 2011·Published
Opinion
The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated denial of the motion. Defendant had an extensive criminal history and an extremely poor .prison disciplinary record (see e.g. People v Gonzalez, 29 AD3d 400 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 867 [2006]). Concur — Saxe, J.P, Catterson, Moskowitz and Acosta, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Pica, 90 A.D.3d 554, 934 N.Y.2d 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
90 A.D.3d 554 (People v. Pica) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Gonzalez
29 A.D.3d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)