People v. Philpots

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Philpots

192 N.W.2d 18, 34 Mich. App. 699

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 29, 1971

DocketDocket No. 9279

StatusPublished

This text of 192 N.W.2d 18 (People v. Philpots) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Philpots, 192 N.W.2d 18, 34 Mich. App. 699 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was charged with the second degree murder of her husband, Hillard Philpots. The trial court sitting without a jury convicted defendant of manslaughter. MCLA § 750.321 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.553). Defendant appeals as of right and assigns two errors to this Court, each of which relates to the sufficiency of the evidence.

Upon examination of the record, we find no error depriving the defendant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was charged with the second degree murder of her husband, Hillard Philpots. The trial court sitting without a jury convicted defendant of manslaughter. MCLA § 750.321 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.553). Defendant appeals as of right and assigns two errors to this Court, each of which relates to the sufficiency of the evidence.

Upon examination of the record, we find no error depriving the defendant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 N.W.2d 18, 34 Mich. App. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-philpots-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack