People v. Phillips

224 A.D.2d 1027, 638 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1728
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 224 A.D.2d 1027 (People v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Phillips, 224 A.D.2d 1027, 638 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Lastly, defendant fails to demonstrate that County Court abused its discretion in sentencing him or that extraordinary circumstances exist that would warrant a reduction of the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, LaMendola, J. — Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Taplin
1 A.D.2d 1044 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D.2d 1027, 638 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-phillips-nyappdiv-1996.