People v. Phillips

96 N.E.2d 444, 302 N.Y. 559, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 771
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 4, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 96 N.E.2d 444 (People v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Phillips, 96 N.E.2d 444, 302 N.Y. 559, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 771 (N.Y. 1951).

Opinion

Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows: Order affirmed. Upon this appeal there was presented and necessarily passed upon the following question: Whether the failure of the trial court to inform the defendant of his right to have counsel assigned to represent him constituted a denial of due process and thereby violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that in the circumstances of this case, such failure so to inform defendant did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. [See 301 N. Y. 733.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Phillips
95 N.E.2d 409 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 N.E.2d 444, 302 N.Y. 559, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-phillips-ny-1951.