People v. Phillip

279 A.D.2d 537, 718 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 395
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 16, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 279 A.D.2d 537 (People v. Phillip) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Phillip, 279 A.D.2d 537, 718 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), rendered December 10, 1998, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The trial court properly determined that the prosecutor’s facially-neutral explanations for excusing two black prospective jurors were not pretextual (see, People v Payne, 88 NY2d 172; see also, People v Allen, 86 NY2d 101).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Bracken, Acting P. J., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Doyle
295 A.D.2d 446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D.2d 537, 718 N.Y.S.2d 879, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-phillip-nyappdiv-2001.