People v. Phears

424 N.E.2d 553, 53 N.Y.2d 1001, 441 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2534
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 1981·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s contentions other than that based upon collateral estoppel are either not preserved or without merit. As to that argument, it is sufficient to quote People v Lo Cicero (14 NY2d 374, 380): “Since the State of New York was not a party to the Federal prosecution and had no control of that case, collateral estoppel may not be urged against it.”

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Phears, 424 N.E.2d 553, 53 N.Y.2d 1001, 441 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2534 (N.Y. 1981).

424 N.E.2d 553 (People v. Phears) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Nezaj
154 A.D.2d 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)