People v. Pharr
This text of 204 A.D.2d 126 (People v. Pharr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Anne Williams, J.), rendered October 27, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the third and fourth degrees and assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 Vi to 7 years on the third degree possession count and concurrent terms of 1 year on the remaining counts, unanimously affirmed.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds was properly denied. The 78-day delay attributable to the two arresting officers’ subsequent injuries, fully documented by medical records, was properly excluded since the injuries constituted exceptional circumstances under CPL 30.30 (4) (g) (People v Zirpola, 57 NY2d 706). The due diligence requirement under this section of the CPL does not require the People to present video-taped testimony to the Grand Jury to minimize any delay. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 A.D.2d 126, 612 N.Y.S.2d 115, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pharr-nyappdiv-1994.