People v. Pharms

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. Pharms

925 N.W.2d 838

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 30, 2019

DocketSC: 157360; COA: 335439

StatusPublished

This text of 925 N.W.2d 838 (People v. Pharms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pharms, 925 N.W.2d 838 (Mich. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for articulation of its reasons for finding a lack of merit in the questions presented in the defendant's supplemental brief, filed under AO 2004-6 (Minimum Standards for Indigent Criminal Appellate Defense Services), Standard 4, as part of his appeal of right. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that *839the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for articulation of its reasons for finding a lack of merit in the questions presented in the defendant's supplemental brief, filed under AO 2004-6 (Minimum Standards for Indigent Criminal Appellate Defense Services), Standard 4, as part of his appeal of right. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that *839the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 N.W.2d 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pharms-mich-2019.