People v. Pettus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pettus

53 A.D.2d 597, 385 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13255

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 A.D.2d 597 (People v. Pettus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pettus, 53 A.D.2d 597, 385 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13255 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered October 12, 1973, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first and second degrees, grand larceny in the third degree (two counts) and possession of a weapon, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing defendant’s conviction of the crime of possession of a weapon, vacating the one-year sentence imposed thereon and dismissing said count of the indictment. Except as so modified, said judgment is affirmed. The evidence adduced at the trial was insufficient to support the finding that appellant possessed the revolver displayed by the accomplice or that, with the requisite mental culpability, he solicited, requested, commanded, importuned or intentionally aided another in the possession thereof. (Penal Law, § 20.00.) We have examined the other points raised by appellant and find them without merit. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered October 12, 1973, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first and second degrees, grand larceny in the third degree (two counts) and possession of a weapon, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing defendant’s conviction of the crime of possession of a weapon, vacating the one-year sentence imposed thereon and dismissing said count of the indictment. Except as so modified, said judgment is affirmed. The evidence adduced at the trial was insufficient to support the finding that appellant possessed the revolver displayed by the accomplice or that, with the requisite mental culpability, he solicited, requested, commanded, importuned or intentionally aided another in the possession thereof. (Penal Law, § 20.00.) We have examined the other points raised by appellant and find them without merit. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 597, 385 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pettus-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack