People v. Pettegrew

503 P.2d 276, 8 Cal. 3d 347, 105 Cal. Rptr. 20, 1972 Cal. LEXIS 257
California Supreme Court·Decided November 22, 1972·No. Crim. No. 15841·Published

Opinion

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Defendant, a licensed physician, was charged by information with three counts of violating Penal Code section 274 (abortion). The case was submitted on the record of the preliminary examination and certain stipulations on the first count only. Defendant appeals from the judgment (order granting probation) following conviction by the court sitting without a jury.

For the reasons stated in People v. Barksdale, ante, page 320 [105 Cal.Rptr. 1, 503 P.2d 257], the judgment (order granting probation) is reversed with directions to the trial court to dismiss the information.

Peters, J., Tobriner, J., and Mosk, J., concurred.

BURKE, J.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting and concurring opinion in People v. Barksdale, ante, page 320 [105 Cal.Rptr. 1, 503 P.2d 257], I would affirm the judgment.

McComb, J., and Sullivan, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pettegrew, 503 P.2d 276, 8 Cal. 3d 347, 105 Cal. Rptr. 20, 1972 Cal. LEXIS 257 (Cal. 1972).

503 P.2d 276 (People v. Pettegrew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Barksdale
503 P.2d 257 (California Supreme Court, 1972)