People v. Petro
This text of 437 N.E.2d 284 (People v. Petro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Division determination of reversal was not “on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL 450.90, subd 2, par [a]). Defendant’s challenge to the reliability of the evidence at the suppression hearing was not preserved for appellate review (People v Jenkins, 47 NY2d 722; cf. People v Cona, 49 NY2d 26, 33, n 2). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed (People v Dercole, 52 NY2d 956).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 N.E.2d 284, 56 N.Y.2d 782, 452 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-petro-ny-1982.