People v. Petro
437 N.E.2d 284, 56 N.Y.2d 782, 452 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3419
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Division determination of reversal was not “on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal” (CPL 450.90, subd 2, par [a]). Defendant’s challenge to the reliability of the evidence at the suppression hearing was not preserved for appellate review (People v Jenkins, 47 NY2d 722; cf. People v Cona, 49 NY2d 26, 33, n 2). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed (People v Dercole, 52 NY2d 956).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Petro, 437 N.E.2d 284, 56 N.Y.2d 782, 452 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3419 (N.Y. 1982).
437 N.E.2d 284 (People v. Petro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Petralia
464 N.E.2d 424 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Petralia
93 A.D.2d 842 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)