People v. Petrangelo

2024 NY Slip Op 06607
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 24, 2024
DocketInd. No. 34/20
StatusPublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 06607 (People v. Petrangelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Petrangelo, 2024 NY Slip Op 06607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

People v Petrangelo (2024 NY Slip Op 06607)
People v Petrangelo
2024 NY Slip Op 06607
Decided on December 24, 2024
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 24, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
PAUL WOOTEN
BARRY E. WARHIT
LILLIAN WAN, JJ.

2021-06332
(Ind. No. 34/20)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Daniel Petrangelo, appellant.


Carol Kahn, New York, NY, for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Amie J. Johnson of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Jessica Segal, J.), rendered July 15, 2021, convicting him of attempted kidnapping in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Dutchess County, for the issuance of an amended uniform sentence and commitment sheet in accordance herewith.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255).

As the People correctly concede, the defendant's uniform sentence and commitment sheet erroneously identified the count to which the defendant entered a plea of guilty as count 13 of the indictment when the defendant, in fact, entered a plea of guilty to a reduced charge under count 1 of the indictment. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the County Court, Dutchess County, for the issuance of an amended sentence and commitment sheet that properly reflects the count of the indictment to which the defendant entered a plea of guilty (see People v Iacovino, 184 AD3d 857, 858-859; People v Marks, 128 AD3d 852, 854).

DILLON, J.P., WOOTEN, WARHIT and WAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Marks
128 A.D.3d 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Iacovino
2020 NY Slip Op 3534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 06607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-petrangelo-nyappdiv-2024.