People v. Peterson

250 A.D.2d 863, 672 N.Y.S.2d 796, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5962
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Peterson. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 A.D.2d 815

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered January 25, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The decision to grant or deny a motion for a mistrial is within the trial court’s discretion (see, People v Ortiz, 54 NY2d 288, 292; People v Caban, 224 AD2d 705; People v Hayden, 221 AD2d 367, 368). In this case, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for a mistrial.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not warrant reversal. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Peterson, 250 A.D.2d 863, 672 N.Y.S.2d 796, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

250 A.D.2d 863 (People v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ortiz
429 N.E.2d 794 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Hayden
221 A.D.2d 367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Caban
224 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)