People v. Peters

28 A.D.3d 686, 812 N.Y.S.2d 372
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Peters. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 A.D.3d 928

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the [687]*687Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.), entered October 8, 2003, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the same court (Juviler, J.) rendered July 1, 1998, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate his judgment of conviction on the ground that his trial counsel was ineffective (see People v Smith, 82 NY2d 731, 733 [1993]; People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 799 [1985]; People v Shaw, 232 AD2d 174, 175 [1996]). Viewed objectively, the record demonstrated a legitimate strategic reason for not calling a certain witness to testify at trial (see People v Satterfield, supra). Thus, the defendant failed to demonstrate that he was deprived of meaningful representation (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Peters, 28 A.D.3d 686, 812 N.Y.S.2d 372 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

28 A.D.3d 686 (People v. Peters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Smith
621 N.E.2d 689 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Satterfield
488 N.E.2d 834 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Shaw
232 A.D.2d 174 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)