People v. Perry
This text of 73 A.D.2d 545 (People v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Application by assigned counsel for "permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant,” based upon the conclusory statement in his perfunctory brief, that he "found no non-frivolous issues to be raised on appeal,” granted only to the extent of assigning alternate counsel to prosecute expeditiously the appeal by whatever means deemed appropriate. Present counsel has totally failed to comply with or even attempt to follow the "guidelines” provided in People v Saunders (52 AD2d 833) (People v Carroll, 72 AD2d 710). By so doing, he has rendered himself ineligible for compensation for such efforts. Concur — Fein, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich, Silverman and Ross, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 A.D.2d 545, 423 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-perry-nyappdiv-1979.