People v. Perrine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Perrine

111 A.D.2d 193

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 111 A.D.2d 193 (People v. Perrine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Perrine, 111 A.D.2d 193 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), imposed July 19, 1984.

Sentence affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s assertions, we do not find the sentence imposed to be unduly harsh or excessive. In addition, we conclude that defendant’s application for vacatur of the imposed mandatory surcharge of $75 on the ground of indigency (CPL 420.35) is premature (see, People v West, 124 Misc 2d 622). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), imposed July 19, 1984.

Sentence affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s assertions, we do not find the sentence imposed to be unduly harsh or excessive. In addition, we conclude that defendant’s application for vacatur of the imposed mandatory surcharge of $75 on the ground of indigency (CPL 420.35) is premature (see, People v West, 124 Misc 2d 622). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 A.D.2d 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-perrine-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack