People v. Perkins

221 A.D.2d 482, 634 N.Y.S.2d 385, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11911

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Perkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 189 A.D.2d 830 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 13, 1995·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered December 15, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed [483]*483was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

We have considered the appellant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J. Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed [483]*483was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

We have considered the appellant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Mangano, P. J. Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

People v. Perkins, 221 A.D.2d 482, 634 N.Y.S.2d 385, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

221 A.D.2d 482 (People v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

People v. Suitte

90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Opinion

Related