People v. Perino

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Perino

309 N.E.2d 873, 34 N.Y.2d 541, 354 N.Y.S.2d 103, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1783

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 21, 1974

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 309 N.E.2d 873 (People v. Perino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Perino, 309 N.E.2d 873, 34 N.Y.2d 541, 354 N.Y.S.2d 103, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1783 (N.Y. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: By our affirmance, we do not condone the prosecutor’s conduct during the course of the trial, particularly on summation. In our opinion he unfairly attempted to buttress the People’s case. However, what he did fell short of constituting reversible error (see CPL 470.05, subd. 1).

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: By our affirmance, we do not condone the prosecutor’s conduct during the course of the trial, particularly on summation. In our opinion he unfairly attempted to buttress the People’s case. However, what he did fell short of constituting reversible error (see CPL 470.05, subd. 1).

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Rabin and Stevens.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 N.E.2d 873, 34 N.Y.2d 541, 354 N.Y.S.2d 103, 1974 N.Y. LEXIS 1783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-perino-ny-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack